Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S311396AbSC0JmO>; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 04:42:14 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S312984AbSC0Jlz>; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 04:41:55 -0500
Received: from violet.setuza.cz ([194.149.118.97]:22287 "EHLO violet.setuza.cz")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S311396AbSC0Jlk>;
	Wed, 27 Mar 2002 04:41:40 -0500
Subject: Re: Scheduler priorities
From: Frank Schaefer <frank.schafer@setuza.cz>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20020326175511.GC3536@matchmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release)
Date: 27 Mar 2002 10:41:41 +0100
Message-Id: <1017222101.1123.12.camel@ADMIN>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2002-03-26 at 18:55, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 11:41:39AM +0000, Nuno Miguel Rodrigues wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Does Linux support a fixed process scheduling priority, in the 2.4.x
> > releases?
> > If not, are there any plans to support it?
> 
> Can you elaborate?  What do you mean by "fixed process"?  Minimum percentage
> of CPU?
Hi,

I'd read this ...
a fixed prority of some process ...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/