Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753558AbZKGWq7 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:46:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753382AbZKGWq5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:46:57 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:54002 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753164AbZKGWq5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 17:46:57 -0500 From: Thomas Renninger To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpu-freq: add troubleshooting section for FSB changes Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 23:47:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , davej@redhat.com, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mcgrof@gmail.com, Matthew Garrett , Reinette Chatre , Aeolus Yang , Amod Bodas , David Quan , Kishore Jotwani References: <1257537660-5301-1-git-send-email-lrodriguez@atheros.com> <200911072152.57596.trenn@suse.de> <4AF5F47C.5000402@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4AF5F47C.5000402@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200911072347.05786.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1244 Lines: 29 On Saturday 07 November 2009 11:28:12 pm Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > On Friday 06 November 2009 09:01:00 pm Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> With cpu frequency scaling you may run into some system > >> performance issues when the FSB changes speed due to the > >> throughput constraints this brings on the system. > > > > Interesting. > > Could you be a bit more detailed how and what kind of perfomance issues > > are seen, please. > > I expect IO based issues like WLAN package throughput or even lost > > connections :) > > the bus doesn't get THAT slow..... I expected wireless problems because 5 people with @atheros.com are in CC. There is zero information about the problem itself and possibly affected devices/machines. > in addition, most FSB systems have the memory controller in the chipset, > next to the PCI logic... so that the FSB bus for DMA transactions only > carries the snoop traffic, not the whole data. So when should people look at this? Thomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/