Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 20:19:57 +0000
From: "Emilio G. Cota" <cota@braap.org>
To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>
Cc: Ali Gholami Rudi <ali@rudi.ir>,
       "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
       "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: What's the state of the TX timestamping?
Message-ID: <20091108201948.GA7256@braap.org>
References: <20091108155923.GA820@lilem.mirepesht> <1257701045.29123.288.camel@pohly-mobl1.ikn.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1257701045.29123.288.camel@pohly-mobl1.ikn.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 949
Lines: 26

[dropped trivial@kernel.org since this is not relevant to them]

by the way Patrick,

A few months ago I tried to implement TX timestamping for a card
I was working on [1]. I wasn't quite successful (sorry can't be more
explicit, I haven't touched it since then) and thought the reason
was that the implementation was half-baked because David reverted
it--I got to that conclusion after reading this thread in
linux-net ("TX time stamping"):

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/121378/

Could you please tell me what the state of TX timestamping is?
Did David revert it or not? I can't find a revert commit.

Thanks,
		Emilio

[1] http://www.ohwr.org/twiki/bin/view/OHR/WhiteRabbit/WhiteRabbit

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/