Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754112AbZKIEzW (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:55:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753872AbZKIEzV (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:55:21 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51249 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753752AbZKIEzU (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 23:55:20 -0500 Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:55:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091108.205546.141103466.davem@davemloft.net> To: arnd@arndb.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH 0/7] net, compat_ioctl: move handlers to net/socket.c From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200911082231.48060.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1257530949-9695-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <20091106.204753.223665411.davem@davemloft.net> <200911082231.48060.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 598 Lines: 14 From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 22:31:47 +0100 > Any opinion on how to proceed with the ATM stuff? From my > point of view, I'm fine with having moved it out of fs/compat_ioctl.c, > but it's still a bit silly to have two half-complete implementations. I haven't looked at that stuff yes, you can be sure it's in my queue :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/