Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756020AbZKIOQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:16:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755951AbZKIOQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:16:16 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:50235 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755944AbZKIOQP (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:16:15 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX190N6R1OXd0j0U3mUn2xj4BjrB1qbHU+x+MZcE2Cy Y2iIrbBLWEzh2K Subject: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd From: Mike Galbraith To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , LKML , pm list , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Jesse Barnes In-Reply-To: References: <200911091250.31626.rjw@sisk.pl> <20091109120217.GB18399@elte.hu> <200911091324.37955.rjw@sisk.pl> <20091109124937.GA21114@elte.hu> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:16:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1257776176.6365.8.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.61 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1137 Lines: 32 On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > ok, then my observation should not apply. > > I think it _IS_ releated because the worker_thread is CPU affine and > the debug_smp_processor_id() check does: > > if (cpumask_equal(¤t->cpus_allowed, cpumask_of(this_cpu))) > > which prevents that usage of smp_processor_id() in ksoftirqd and > keventd in preempt enabled regions is warned on. > > We saw exaclty the same back trace with fd21073 (sched: Fix affinity > logic in select_task_rq_fair()). > > Rafael, can you please add a printk to debug_smp_processor_id() so we > can see on which CPU we are running ? I suspect we are on the wrong > one. I wonder if that's not intimately related to the problem I had, namely newidle balancing offline CPUs as they're coming up, making a mess of cpu enumeration. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/