Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755926AbZKIOZa (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:25:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751551AbZKIOZ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:25:29 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:50722 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851AbZKIOZ3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:25:29 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: Help needed: Resume problems in 2.6.32-rc, perhaps related to preempt_count leakage in keventd Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 15:27:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31.5-tst; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , LKML , pm list , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Jesse Barnes References: <200911091250.31626.rjw@sisk.pl> <1257776176.6365.8.camel@marge.simson.net> In-Reply-To: <1257776176.6365.8.camel@marge.simson.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911091527.12249.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1276 Lines: 34 On Monday 09 November 2009, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > ok, then my observation should not apply. > > > > I think it _IS_ releated because the worker_thread is CPU affine and > > the debug_smp_processor_id() check does: > > > > if (cpumask_equal(¤t->cpus_allowed, cpumask_of(this_cpu))) > > > > which prevents that usage of smp_processor_id() in ksoftirqd and > > keventd in preempt enabled regions is warned on. > > > > We saw exaclty the same back trace with fd21073 (sched: Fix affinity > > logic in select_task_rq_fair()). > > > > Rafael, can you please add a printk to debug_smp_processor_id() so we > > can see on which CPU we are running ? I suspect we are on the wrong > > one. > > I wonder if that's not intimately related to the problem I had, namely > newidle balancing offline CPUs as they're coming up, making a mess of > cpu enumeration. Very likely. What did you do to fix it? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/