Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754765AbZKIVX3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:23:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753738AbZKIVX3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:23:29 -0500 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:60866 "EHLO caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752067AbZKIVX2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 16:23:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:23:33 +0000 To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Lennart Sorensen , Matteo Croce , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode Message-ID: <20091109212333.GE15159@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <40101cc30910021912r17b3a08bue1b9412e4fa47d89@mail.gmail.com> <20091003072127.GC21407@elte.hu> <40101cc30911060659k7b3b6428ob1340e476bdbac5b@mail.gmail.com> <4AF4526B.4060101@zytor.com> <40101cc30911081042n93e268bs66b9436a0174a19a@mail.gmail.com> <20091109201608.GD15159@caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> <4AF886D4.1080108@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF886D4.1080108@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1536 Lines: 35 On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:17:08PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 11/09/2009 12:16 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > > > > The Geode LX is what is being discussed which is in fact mostly a K6 as > > far as I understand things. It seems to like i686 code, other than > > apparently those NOP instructions. I wonder if the K6 has those noop > > instructions and if not, perhaps gcc 4.4's -march=k6-3 would be the > > right choice. I have always suspected the LX was really a K6-3 based > > design (the cache sizes are a bit different, but clock speeds and > > instruction sets seem to match). > > > > The Geode NX (which no one has mentioned yet) is an Athlon derived chip. > > > > *As far as I know* K6 didn't have NOPL, whereas K7 does. Which would be mroe indication that the Geode LX may in fact be a K6 based CPU design. The Geode NX is very clearly an Athlon (K7) and AMD has never even tried to hide that. They have never said what the LX is based on, other than it isn't based on the GX (fortunately, that thing was a buggy piece of crap). > Someone who has access to these chips could run that as an experiment. I have lots of Geode SC1200 (GX2 SoC) and Geode LX systems around. I think I might even have a K6-2 at home in the garage come to think of it. -- Len Sorensen -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/