Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754247AbZKIXiY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:38:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752923AbZKIXiX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:38:23 -0500 Received: from mga10.intel.com ([192.55.52.92]:59556 "EHLO fmsmga102.fm.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750928AbZKIXiX (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 18:38:23 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,711,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="512209748" Subject: Re: [patch] added brightness feature to lcd class. From: Richard Purdie To: InKi Dae Cc: linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kyungmin Park , Andrew Morton , Pavel Machek In-Reply-To: <90b950fc0911020050q3bc3fae8j954ec6ed73d79b5@mail.gmail.com> References: <90b950fc0911020050q3bc3fae8j954ec6ed73d79b5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:35:05 +0000 Message-Id: <1257809705.29038.82.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1919 Lines: 52 On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 17:50 +0900, InKi Dae wrote: > This patch adds brightness feature to lcd class. > (kernel/driver/video/backlight/lcd.c) > > In the past, most of the lcd panels for embedded system was TFT-LCD > Panel needing backlight device. > But now AMOLED LCD Panel appeared so we should consider brightness > control for AMOLED Panel. > > For the time being, I used backlight fake driver for brightness > control of AMOLED LCD Panel. > But this way is not good, so I propose to add brightness feature to lcd class. > > For this, I attached patch file and if my proposal is approved > Then I will send s6e63m0 and tl2796 AMOLED lcd panel driver based on > lcd class modified soon. Pavel has a good point but let me try and explain it differently. The point of the backlight class is to expose a backlight brightness control to userspace in a consistent well defined way. Anyone wishing to write a piece of software to control the brightness of a backlight then only needs to support *one* interface. It is entirely accepted and normal that multiple "class" devices may appear in userspace for one piece of physical hardware. Your patch duplicates a userspace API and means any backlight application would have to look for *two* different interfaces. This is unacceptable. Why can't your driver just register a backlight interface and an LCD interface? I'd imagine your backlight and LCD can be powered on/off separately too. Please also cc: the backlight/lcd maintainer (me) on backlight/lcd patches in future. Andrew: Can you drop that patch from -mm please as I'm not convinced we need two backlight brightness interfaces around... Cheers, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/