Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755199AbZKJCJB (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:09:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754725AbZKJCJA (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:09:00 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]:33210 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753002AbZKJCI7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2009 21:08:59 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,712,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="209591862" Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:08:58 +0800 From: Wu Fengguang To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Martin Knoblauch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Likley stupid question on "throttle_vm_writeout" Message-ID: <20091110020858.GA5749@localhost> References: <799070.68490.qm@web32608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1257780393.4108.343.camel@laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1257780393.4108.343.camel@laptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1436 Lines: 37 On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:26:33PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 07:15 -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > Hi, (please CC me on replies) > > > > I have a likely stupid question on the function "throttle_vm_writeout". Looking at the code I find: > > > > if (global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS) + > > global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK) <= dirty_thresh) > > break; > > congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10); > > > > Shouldn't the NR_FILE_DIRTY pages be considered as well? > > Ha, you just trod onto a piece of ugly I'd totally forgotten about ;-) > > The intent of throttle_vm_writeout() is to limit the total pages in > writeout and to wait for them to go-away. Like this: vmscan fast => large NR_WRITEBACK => throttle vmscan based on it > Everybody hates the function, nobody managed to actually come up with > anything better. btw, here is another reason to limit NR_WRITEBACK: I saw many throttle_vm_writeout() waits if there is no wait queue to limit NR_WRITEBACK (eg. NFS). In that case the (steadily) big NR_WRITEBACK is _not_ caused by fast vmscan.. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/