Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:20:32 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC] new -stable tag variant, Git workflow question
Message-ID: <20091110042032.GD29454@elte.hu>
References: <20091110034831.GB26809@elte.hu>
 <20091110041452.GA25575@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091110041452.GA25575@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1244
Lines: 29


* Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:

> > I've attached the full commit below. The prereq commits are not 
> > uptream yet, and they dont carry a -stable backporting tag as the 
> > -stable relevance was not anticipated at that point yet. They will 
> > all be upstream in the next merge window when Linus merges the 
> > relevant tree - and then all these tags become visible to the 
> > -stable team's scripts.
> > 
> > What do you think about this new -stable tagging variant? To me it 
> > looks quite intuitive, less error-prone and it is more informative 
> > as well. Furthermore, it gives us some freedom to mark commits as 
> > backport candidates later on. I kept them oneliners for the purpose 
> > of making them all self-sufficient tags.
> 
> I agree.

Ok - thanks for the confirmation - i've pushed out the first such 
commit. (Let me know if there's any problem with it down the line - it 
will be a few weeks, in the next merge window, until it truly 
'activates' for -stable.)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/