Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753967AbZKJRWZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:22:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752613AbZKJRWY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:22:24 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:49391 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752393AbZKJRWX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 12:22:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:22:02 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: James Bottomley Cc: Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC] new -stable tag variant, Git workflow question Message-ID: <20091110172202.GB25581@elte.hu> References: <20091110034831.GB26809@elte.hu> <20091110041452.GA25575@suse.de> <20091110042032.GD29454@elte.hu> <1257863432.4184.223.camel@mulgrave.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1257863432.4184.223.camel@mulgrave.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1616 Lines: 38 * James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 05:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Greg KH wrote: > > > > > > I've attached the full commit below. The prereq commits are not > > > > uptream yet, and they dont carry a -stable backporting tag as the > > > > -stable relevance was not anticipated at that point yet. They will > > > > all be upstream in the next merge window when Linus merges the > > > > relevant tree - and then all these tags become visible to the > > > > -stable team's scripts. > > > > > > > > What do you think about this new -stable tagging variant? To me it > > > > looks quite intuitive, less error-prone and it is more informative > > > > as well. Furthermore, it gives us some freedom to mark commits as > > > > backport candidates later on. I kept them oneliners for the purpose > > > > of making them all self-sufficient tags. > > > > > > I agree. > > > > Ok - thanks for the confirmation - i've pushed out the first such > > commit. (Let me know if there's any problem with it down the line - it > > will be a few weeks, in the next merge window, until it truly > > 'activates' for -stable.) > > Can you give me the commit id in your tree so I can run a few tests? Let me re-quote what you quoted above: > > > > I've attached the full commit below. [...] Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/