Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752677AbZKJVJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:09:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751411AbZKJVJp (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:09:45 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:49473 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbZKJVJo (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:09:44 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:09:41 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Daniel Mack Cc: David Newall , Alan Cox , Clemens Ladisch , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vt: make the default cursor shape configurable Message-ID: <20091110210940.GA1590@ucw.cz> References: <4AF7D439.4030305@ladisch.de> <20091109091044.GX29442@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <4AF7DDC1.4090006@ladisch.de> <20091109095316.6283fbd6@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4AF7FC64.6030904@ladisch.de> <20091109114600.4d91b90e@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20091109145056.GB14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <4AF8582B.2000403@davidnewall.com> <20091109220944.GH14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091109220944.GH14091@buzzloop.caiaq.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1340 Lines: 33 On Mon 2009-11-09 23:09:44, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:28:03AM +1030, David Newall wrote: > > Daniel Mack wrote: > > > And even if the cursor behaviour is changable at runtime, I don't see > > > why it shouldn't have a selectable compile time default. Which is what > > > the patch adds. > > > > > > It seems like adding cruft to the kernel that is just as effectively > > available at run-time. Where does it end? Do we eventually add bash to > > the kernel? > > One more thing: > > Clemens' last patch didn't add anything to the kernel's binary size. > It didn't slow down anything either, as there is no run-time condition > evaluation. It just makes something configurable which was hard > coded before. So where's the cruft? The number of configs to test just got bigger. 100% bigger in fact. Every single developer will have to answer 'do you want blinking cursor?' when your patch is merged. config options _are_ expensive. -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/