Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755566AbZKJV0p (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:26:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754807AbZKJV0p (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:26:45 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57540 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754692AbZKJV0o (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:26:44 -0500 Message-ID: <4AF9D8E2.7050205@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:19:30 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Willy Tarreau CC: Pavel Machek , Avi Kivity , Alan Cox , Matteo Croce , Sven-Haegar Koch , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: i686 quirk for AMD Geode References: <4AF9020C.90108@zytor.com> <4AF9435F.2070103@redhat.com> <20091110105642.215804e0@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4AF99E04.8080704@zytor.com> <20091110172454.3c4481f2@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <4AF9B5AB.5010800@zytor.com> <4AF9C3EF.6000705@redhat.com> <4AF9C6AB.8080006@zytor.com> <20091110201602.GA26633@1wt.eu> <20091110205445.GB1407@ucw.cz> <20091110211259.GD26633@1wt.eu> In-Reply-To: <20091110211259.GD26633@1wt.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1409 Lines: 28 On 11/10/2009 01:12 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > yes, just like with emulated FPU or trapped unaligned accesses. It's > just like flying fishes. They exist but they aren't the most common > ones. If people encounter these cases on a specific program, then > they just have to recompile it if it is a problem. At least they > don't rebuild the whole distro. And once again, I've been using > cmpxchg/bswap emulation for years on my i386 without feeling any > need for a rebuild, and CMOV emulation for years now on my mini-itx > C3 without any problem either. These are real experiences, not just > fears of imaginary problems. Yes I can design a program to run 400 > times slower on these machines if I want. I just don't feel the need > to do so and apparently existing programs' authors didn't either. Willy, perhaps you can come up with a list of features you think should be emulated, together with an explanation of why you opted for that list of features and *did not* opt for others. Note: emulated FPU is a special subcase. The FPU operations are heavyweight enough that the overhead of trapping versus library calls is relatively insignificant. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/