Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:19:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:19:44 -0500 Received: from chaos.analogic.com ([204.178.40.224]:47746 "EHLO chaos.analogic.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 6 Dec 2000 13:19:26 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:48:39 -0500 (EST) From: "Richard B. Johnson" Reply-To: root@chaos.analogic.com To: Giacomo Catenazzi cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: test12-pre4: spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. In-Reply-To: <3A2E6E2B.52406DE4@student.ethz.ch> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote: > On my box, with heavy load I saw: > spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7. > Newer seen this message before. > > Linux (2.4.0.11.4) or my old slow box ? > > > giacomo > This is really "normal" occasionally, and probably should not be logged. This "catch all" interrupt has to be handled, to keep the controllers happy, but should not be of any concern. FYI, you can also get a false cascade interrupt on some boxen. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.4.0 on an i686 machine (799.54 BogoMips). "Memory is like gasoline. You use it up when you are running. Of course you get it all back when you reboot..."; Actual explanation obtained from the Micro$oft help desk. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/