Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754177AbZKKD4E (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:56:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752231AbZKKD4D (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:56:03 -0500 Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:44263 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbZKKD4C (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:56:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4AFA35CB.5030801@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 12:55:55 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 References: <4AF90254.40909@kernel.org> <4AF9B1FD.1010408@kernel.org> <4AF9BE3A.40409@kernel.org> <20091110193705.GA9011@elte.hu> <4AF9C402.9040800@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 25 Hello, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I want the cleanup because I think that the code sucks from a "future > proofing" and readability standpoint, but I really don't mind one way or > the other whether you want to finally do that one "return 1" correctly for > one commit, only to then fix it to not do that three-way test of a single > function in the next one. > > So whatever works - as long as the end result both looks sane and doesn't > have the bug we clearly have now. I was mostly worrying about introducing unrelated bug while changing. Anyways, one patch it is. I'll route it through tip as suggested by Ingo in a few hours. Thanks a lot. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/