Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752126AbZKKGWk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:22:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751886AbZKKGWk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:22:40 -0500 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:60405 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751727AbZKKGWj (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:22:39 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:20:04 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: David Rientjes Cc: Daisuke Nishimura , KOSAKI Motohiro , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] oom-kill: fix NUMA consraint check with nodemask v4.1 Message-Id: <20091111152004.3d585cee.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20091110162121.361B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091110162445.c6db7521.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091110163419.361E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091110164055.a1b44a4b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091110170338.9f3bb417.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20091110171704.3800f081.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091111112404.0026e601.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091111134514.4edd3011.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20091111142811.eb16f062.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2302 Lines: 65 On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:58:31 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > > Index: mm-test-kernel/drivers/char/sysrq.c > > =================================================================== > > --- mm-test-kernel.orig/drivers/char/sysrq.c > > +++ mm-test-kernel/drivers/char/sysrq.c > > @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_term_op > > > > static void moom_callback(struct work_struct *ignored) > > { > > - out_of_memory(node_zonelist(0, GFP_KERNEL), GFP_KERNEL, 0); > > + out_of_memory(node_zonelist(0, GFP_KERNEL), GFP_KERNEL, 0, NULL); > > } > > > > static DECLARE_WORK(moom_work, moom_callback); > > Index: mm-test-kernel/mm/oom_kill.c > > =================================================================== > > --- mm-test-kernel.orig/mm/oom_kill.c > > +++ mm-test-kernel/mm/oom_kill.c > > @@ -196,27 +196,47 @@ unsigned long badness(struct task_struct > > /* > > * Determine the type of allocation constraint. > > */ > > -static inline enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist, > > - gfp_t gfp_mask) > > -{ > > #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA > > +static enum oom_constraint constrained_alloc(struct zonelist *zonelist, > > + gfp_t gfp_mask, nodemask_t *nodemask) > > +{ > > struct zone *zone; > > struct zoneref *z; > > enum zone_type high_zoneidx = gfp_zone(gfp_mask); > > - nodemask_t nodes = node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]; > > + int ret = CONSTRAINT_NONE; > > > > - for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist, high_zoneidx) > > - if (cpuset_zone_allowed_softwall(zone, gfp_mask)) > > - node_clear(zone_to_nid(zone), nodes); > > - else > > - return CONSTRAINT_CPUSET; > > + /* > > + * Reach here only when __GFP_NOFAIL is used. So, we should avoid > > + * to kill current.We have to random task kill in this case. > > + * Hopefully, CONSTRAINT_THISNODE...but no way to handle it, now. > > + */ > > + if (gfp_mask & __GPF_THISNODE) > > + return ret; > > > > That shouldn't compile. > Why ? Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/