Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:48:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:48:04 -0500 Received: from E0-IBE.r.miee.ru ([194.226.0.89]:41733 "EHLO ibe.miee.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 07:47:52 -0500 From: Samium Gromoff Message-Id: <200203281538.g2SFcUl06361@ibe.miee.ru> Subject: Re: Networking with slow CPUs To: pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:38:29 +0300 (MSK) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Is there a possibility to "harden" a small machine (33 MHz embedded > > device) against e.g. flood pings from the outside world? > > > > AFAIK, there is a mechanism to switch off the interrupts generated > by the network card, if the load is getting too high. This way the > packets get overwritten on the nic buffers and do not even reach > the CPU. this is a whole new strategy: ie you switch from interrupt-driven handling to periodicall polls of the NIC. last time i`ve heard of it it was the bleeding edge Jamal`s model of the lowlevel network engine. regards, Samium Gromoff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/