Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757569AbZKKPQN (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:16:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757377AbZKKPQM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:16:12 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:37474 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756746AbZKKPQM (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:16:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:16:16 +0100 From: Jan Blunck To: Phillip Lougher Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: BKL: Remove BKL from Squashfs Message-ID: <20091111151616.GF21750@bolzano.suse.de> References: <20091110121511.5adca8a9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4AF9D6EE.1070205@lougher.demon.co.uk> <4AF9DD24.8060501@lougher.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AF9DD24.8060501@lougher.demon.co.uk> Organization: SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1298 Lines: 38 On Tue, Nov 10, Phillip Lougher wrote: > Phillip Lougher wrote: > > >This patch was prompted by Jan Blunck's "Push down BKL to the > >filesystems" patch > >series, where he firstly pushes the BKL down to individual filesystems > >(even if they don't need it) , and then successively removes them > >(on a one patch per filesystem basis) in later patches. > > > >The patch should be reviewed in the context that it is intended for Jan's > >BKL removal patch series. > > > > Jan and/or Matthew, > > Can you please ACK this patch, and say whether you're going to > add it to your BKL patch series? (I'm happy for it to go through > there, rather than my Squashfs tree). > > After reviewing your patches, it seems to me that the BKL isn't > needed in Squashfs. You removed it from 23 filesystems because > it's not protecting any shared state, on that basis it isn't needed > needed in Squashfs either. Yes, I'll do this through my patch series. I'll rework the series a bit and will repost it soon. Thanks, Jan -- Jan Blunck -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/