Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:30:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:29:55 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:56333 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:29:39 -0500 Message-ID: <3CA3529E.80E70428@zip.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:27:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-pre4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Gerst CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [patch] ext2_fill_super breakage In-Reply-To: <3CA2C68E.5B8C4176@zip.com.au> <3CA31BF6.7030609@didntduck.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Brian Gerst wrote: > > Andrew Morton wrote: > > In 2.5.7 there is a thinko in the allocation and initialisation > > of the fs-private superblock for ext2. It's passing the wrong type > > to the sizeof operator (which of course gives the wrong size) > > when allocating and clearing the memory. > > > > Lesson for the day: this is one of the reasons why this idiom: > > > > some_type *p; > > > > p = malloc(sizeof(*p)); > > ... > > memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p)); > > > > is preferable to > > > > some_type *p; > > > > p = malloc(sizeof(some_type)); > > ... > > memset(p, 0, sizeof(some_type)); > > > > I checked the other filesystems. They're OK (but idiomatically > > impure). I've added a couple of defensive memsets where > > they were missing. > > I'm not sure I follow you here. Compiling this code (gcc 2.96): > > int foo1(void) { return sizeof(struct ext2_sb_info); } > int foo2(struct ext2_sb_info *sbi) { return sizeof(*sbi); } The current code is using sizeof(ext2_super_block) for something which is of type ext2_sb_info. > yields: > > 00000b70 : > b70: b8 dc 00 00 00 mov $0xdc,%eax > b75: c3 ret > > 00000b80 : > b80: b8 dc 00 00 00 mov $0xdc,%eax > b85: c3 ret > > The sizes are the same, so unless it makes a difference with another > version of gcc then this is just a cosmetic change. The stylistic change tends to provide insulation from the above bug. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/