Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753439AbZKLQ0K (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753326AbZKLQ0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:06 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:36956 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752832AbZKLQ0F (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:05 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:26:10 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz To: Dave Jones cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.31.4: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c:390 hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80() [occurs when ACPI_PROCESSOR=y] In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20091111195016.GB22225@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2807 Lines: 67 On Wed, 11 Nov 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Hi, Any other clues/things to try to find out why this is happening? Here is the dmesg from Phoronix but they are using an i750 not an i870, the only differences that I can note are below: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_p55&num=3 Phoronix: [ 0.468994] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 0 [ 0.468999] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 0.472841] hpet: hpet2 irq 24 for MSI [ 0.473257] hpet: hpet3 irq 25 for MSI [ 0.477260] hpet: hpet4 irq 26 for MSI [ 0.481251] hpet: hpet5 irq 27 for MSI My host: [ 0.656054] hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 0 [ 0.656060] hpet0: 8 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter [ 0.659020] hpet: hpet2 irq 24 for MSI [ 0.659253] hpet: hpet3 irq 25 for MSI [ 0.659993] hpet: hpet4 irq 26 for MSI [ 0.660317] hpet: hpet5 irq 27 for MSI [ 0.661001] hpet: hpet6 irq 28 for MSI Much of their dmesg is the same as mine with the exception of the of the problem I am reporting, what is the best way to debug this problem further? Perhaps the Phoronix configuration does not have processor loaded in the kernel or as a module? Again, the problem: [ 3.318770] cpuidle: using governor ladder [ 3.321556] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3.321560] WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c:390 hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80() [ 3.321561] Hardware name: [ 3.321562] Modules linked in: [ 3.321564] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.31.5 #17 [ 3.321565] Call Trace: [ 3.321567] [] ? hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80 [ 3.321568] [] ? hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80 [ 3.321571] [] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x74/0xd0 [ 3.321573] [] ? hpet_next_event+0x70/0x80 [ 3.321576] [] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x36/0xb0 [ 3.321578] [] ? tick_broadcast_oneshot_control+0x119/0x120 [ 3.321579] [] ? tick_notify+0x22d/0x420 [ 3.321581] [] ? notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x70 [ 3.321583] [] ? clockevents_notify+0x2b/0x90 [ 3.321586] [] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x15f/0x2d3 [ 3.321587] [] ? acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xf1/0xfc [ 3.321590] [] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xba/0x120 [ 3.321593] [] ? cpu_idle+0x62/0xc0 [ 3.321596] ---[ end trace cac202f11005305c ]--- [ 3.553852] cpuidle: using governor menu Justin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/