Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753992AbZKLSWj (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753702AbZKLSWg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:36 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42664 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753593AbZKLSWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:22:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:21:20 -0200 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Alan Cox Cc: Andrew Morton , Eran Liberty , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial_core: avoid Break bouncing Message-ID: <20091112162120.45b33ecf@pedra.chehab.org> In-Reply-To: <20091112175649.145cbf18@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20091112140504.6daf3824@pedra.chehab.org> <20091112175649.145cbf18@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1707 Lines: 49 Em Thu, 12 Nov 2009 17:56:49 +0000 Alan Cox escreveu: > On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:05:04 -0200 > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > From: Eran Liberty > > > > On some boxes, Break signal bounces, causing sysrq code to fail with some > > serial interfaces. > > > > A solution were posted on LKML in 2008: > > http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0809.2/0730.html > > > > However, the fix weren't applied upstream. > > Because it was NAKked at the time as it seemed to be a bug in Eran's > hardware platform not a generic problem and also because it breaks > autobauding on break as used by some (particularly older) software. > > It's still NAKked and it would be helpful if people resubmitting old > stuff also looked through the thread attached the original submission. I did, but I haven't find any nack at the public archives I've checked. My fault. Sorry about that. > You seem to have a single case of a user with some kind of buggy uart or > possibly other weirdness going on. That's probably worth investigating > more deeply but the patch NAKked before is not the solution due to its > side effects I'll do a deeper analysis and come back with a patch only if I discover something new about this issue. > > (also btw it'll upset other people who script their sysrq stuff including > breaks and don't expect strange timing limits) > > NAK again -- Cheers, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/