Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:48:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:47:53 -0500 Received: from 198.216-123-194-0.interbaun.com ([216.123.194.198]:3077 "EHLO mail.harddata.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 19:47:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:47:24 -0700 From: Michal Jaegermann To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: tulip driver again Message-ID: <20020328174724.A24374@mail.harddata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I know that this is boring and a number of my earlier reports was apparently ignored but a tulip driver "0.9.15-pre10 (Mar 8, 2002)" as used in 2.4.19-pre4 still does not really work. I know that it is fine with various clones like "Davicom" and "Lite-On PNIC", for example, but with a real tulip from DEC, PCI id 1011:0019, not a single ethernet packet is getting through. Luckily 'de4x5' allows me to use a network but maybe this "tulip" driver should be renamed onto "anything-but-tulip"? Michal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/