Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:43:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:43:32 -0500 Received: from 12-234-33-29.client.attbi.com ([12.234.33.29]:33866 "HELO top.worldcontrol.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 21:43:17 -0500 From: brian@worldcontrol.com Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:40:21 -0800 To: Michal Jaegermann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tulip driver again Message-ID: <20020329024021.GA2887@top.worldcontrol.com> Mail-Followup-To: Brian Litzinger , Michal Jaegermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020328174724.A24374@mail.harddata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-No-Archive: yes X-Noarchive: yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 05:47:24PM -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > I know that this is boring and a number of my earlier reports was > apparently ignored but a tulip driver "0.9.15-pre10 (Mar 8, 2002)" > as used in 2.4.19-pre4 still does not really work. I know that it is > fine with various clones like "Davicom" and "Lite-On PNIC", for example, > but with a real tulip from DEC, PCI id 1011:0019, not a single ethernet > packet is getting through. There is a tulip specific discussion list, which may explain why you get ignored on this forum. List-Id: Linux Tulip device driver list. List-Help: -- Brian Litzinger Copyright (c) 2002 By Brian Litzinger, All Rights Reserved - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/