Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932180AbZKMWSa (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:18:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756570AbZKMWS0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:18:26 -0500 Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.24]:14235 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756103AbZKMWSZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:18:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GlVcxLlaWisRNQIBlS0GBmRx+AOqEDFxbv+LosLHTWmnB45W94mQ1aiymQyGXdyQn7 GezXbpKrCVzKRMjPUNMgtqDBENgK3u3VQQV6ixYgyr8jBV2kag6ubY7Xgee6Kwy+55YB YTRBLTO84mI6L3TGafvYS7bBrJmG42gHLrq1M= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: remove experimental tag on PATA drivers Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 23:17:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-96.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Robert Hancock , "linux-kernel" , ide , Jeff Garzik References: <4AFCC0D4.9020708@gmail.com> <200911132039.06929.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091113213007.774e75e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091113213007.774e75e3@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911132317.35088.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 29 On Friday 13 November 2009 22:30:07 Alan Cox wrote: > > > > PATA_CMD64X: EXPERIMENTAL > > > > - potential data corruption issues remains unfixed for CMD64[3,6] > > > > > > Patch in testing, and unlike the old IDE one it doesn't cripple the > > > controller but implements the proper workaround in full including > > > permitting parallel PIO command streams. I'll push that back through > > > stable once done. > > > > This patch is way too complex and risky for -rc, let alone -stable. > > How would you know - I've not posted it yet ? And btw I don't plan to I prefer to not talk about "virtual" patches (especially since I'm still waiting for HPA fixes promised in May) and the only patch so far was the one from two weeks ago: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/43136 [ it has still unfixed problems.. ] -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/