Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:36:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:35:50 -0500 Received: from sigint.cs.purdue.edu ([128.10.2.82]:35488 "HELO sigint.cs.purdue.edu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:35:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 09:35:37 -0500 From: hatefullinuxuser@diediedie.net To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bkbits.net down Message-ID: <20020329093537.A30425@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:50:22AM +0000, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote: > Larry McVoy writes: > > >The drive has bad blocks and when it hits them it goes into retry la la land, > >so I won't know which data is bad until I hit the bad blocks. > > You've learned now the hard way why integrity checks in an application > will never be able to replace things like backups or RAID systems. > Maybe you want to reread the flamewar^Wthread from some time ago with > your new knowledge. Yeah, maybe he should buy a big fat RAID array with all the money he's getting from Linux kernel developers. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/