Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753352AbZKORR6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:17:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752803AbZKORR6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:17:58 -0500 Received: from fifo99.com ([67.223.236.141]:56705 "EHLO fifo99.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752714AbZKORR5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:17:57 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning From: Daniel Walker To: Felipe Contreras Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Len Brown , Lin Ming , Bob Moore , Andi Kleen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <94a0d4530911131228s6b6b6221o7b24002ca03373e5@mail.gmail.com> References: <1252870707-4824-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-5-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252936556.28368.215.camel@desktop> <94a0d4530909140734q51779b76g2ddc7211ece87171@mail.gmail.com> <1252940549.28368.255.camel@desktop> <94a0d4530911111623h1ae3463dte8a3f83ec0ad1f75@mail.gmail.com> <1258134207.6411.0.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <94a0d4530911131228s6b6b6221o7b24002ca03373e5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 09:15:51 -0800 Message-Id: <1258305351.6428.8.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1759 Lines: 42 On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 22:28 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 02:23 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > >> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:34 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> >> I did... the style issues are already there, my patch is not > >> >> introducing them. Do you want me to send a separate patch to fix the > >> >> existing style issues? > >> > > >> > Yes, If your inclined to clean up the whole file, or just the > >> > surrounding code that would be helpful .. > >> > >> Nobody seems to like the patch you suggested me to do... did I wasted > >> my time doing it? > >> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/42383 > > > > Did you get some negative feedback ? I don't see any.. > > Well: > --- > And after today's discussion on kernel summit on this topic, I wouldn't > expect any maintainer to merge it, sorry :) > --- > > That doesn't seem too positive. Or at least there's no indication that > somebody will pick it up. I'd re-submit with a better description of the patch. You should always try to describe what your doing as accurately as possible so the maintainer doesn't have to work very hard to know what your doing.. That particular patch just has a one liner description that wasn't very informative .. Either that or re-submit your series without that patch if you don't have confidence in it. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/