Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313467AbSC2QBq>; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:01:46 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313472AbSC2QBZ>; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:01:25 -0500
Received: from [129.27.43.9] ([129.27.43.9]:62886 "EHLO xarch.tu-graz.ac.at")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S313467AbSC2QBY>;
	Fri, 29 Mar 2002 11:01:24 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:00:36 +0100 (CET)
From: <mtopper@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at>
To: Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Request for 2.4.20 to be a non-trivial-bugfixes-only version
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020329101556.0188aea8@mailhost.ivimey.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203291659250.23355-100000@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Ruth Ivimey-Cook wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> Can we celebrate getting to 2.4.20 with a really super-stable version of 
> the kernel, by only admitting patches that fix known and significant bugs 
> (that is, no new features, no more optimisations, no backports, no "it's 
> only a line" fixes)?
> 
> It would help 2.4 a lot, I think.
> 

I'd prefer that too! We've always cheered these x.y.20 versions for being
so stable (2.2.20 comes to mind). I hope we can keep up the tradition *g*


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/