Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S310577AbSC2SQR>; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:16:17 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S310606AbSC2SQH>; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:16:07 -0500
Received: from [129.27.43.9] ([129.27.43.9]:15015 "EHLO xarch.tu-graz.ac.at")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S310577AbSC2SP6>;
	Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:15:58 -0500
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:15:10 +0100 (CET)
From: <mtopper@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Ruth Ivimey-Cook <Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Request for 2.4.20 to be a non-trivial-bugfixes-only version
In-Reply-To: <E16qzE4-0001Vm-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0203291914160.9946-100000@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org


> [Alan:] 
> 2.2.20 is stable because its been slowly refined to that and is now at the
> point where on the hole the painting and bolt tightening is all that needs
> doing. The 2.4 tree suffered serious earthquake damage in 2.4.10 which
> hasn't entirely been fixed yet.
> 

Okay...ah...in this case: What, precisely, *is* the problem since 2.4.10 ?

Yours, MT

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/