Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:28:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:28:17 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:65291 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 13:28:05 -0500 Subject: Re: Request for 2.4.20 to be a non-trivial-bugfixes-only version To: mtopper@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 18:42:17 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), Ruth.Ivimey-Cook@ivimey.org (Ruth Ivimey-Cook), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org) In-Reply-To: from "mtopper@xarch.tu-graz.ac.at" at Mar 29, 2002 07:15:10 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > point where on the hole the painting and bolt tightening is all that needs > > doing. The 2.4 tree suffered serious earthquake damage in 2.4.10 which > > hasn't entirely been fixed yet. > > Okay...ah...in this case: What, precisely, *is* the problem since 2.4.10 ? Linus changed the VM and chunks of the block layer in 2.4.10, that set back stability work very seriously. It was a mistake but it happened, and most of the repair work is done now. Not all of it. We've also gained things like file system direct I/O as a result, so long term it may pay off, even though it should have gone into 2.5 for stabilizing first - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/