Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:20:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:20:42 -0500 Received: from dns2.s.bonet.se ([212.181.54.3]:41488 "EHLO dns2.s.bonet.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:20:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3CA4E82D.6010408@2gen.com> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 23:18:21 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?David_H=E4rdeman?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.9+) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.4.17 with VT8367 [KT266] crashes on heavy ide load togeter with heavy network load Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, First off, I'd like to thank Andre Hedrick for the link to: http://www.tecchannel.de/hardware/817/index.html It was very helpful in making me understand why the performance of my newly bought Adaptec 2400A IDE-Raid card sucked so badly in combination with my VIA KT133 based board. I have done some testing (on the Win platform since that's where the patches to remedy this situation are available) that shows quite nicely how the PCI bus gets totally overrun by transfer rates in excess of approximately 74MB/s and instead slows down. Short summary ============= Expected rate Experienced rate 84MB/s 50MB/s 80MB/s 64MB/s 74MB/s 74MB/s (If someone is very interested, mail me and I can publish some transfer rate graphs online) I just have a few questions: 1) Is there any efforts made to add the "hacks" that VIA has put into their (win only patch) at: http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=66#raid into the kernel? Does VIA give out specs what the patch does? 2) Has anyone had any experiences with the VIA KT333 chipset? Does it have the same numerous problems that the KT133/266 seem to have? 3) Could someone recommend another non-VIA chipset to use instead that they've had good experiences with? (since I am going to buy a new motherboard to remedy this situation) Thanks in advance and please CC me any answers since I'm not on the list. Regards, David david@2gen.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/