Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755716AbZKQCGY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755449AbZKQCGY (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:24 -0500 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:36371 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752942AbZKQCGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:06:23 -0500 Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:02:02 -0500 From: Theodore Tso To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Frank Mayhar , Holger Freyther Subject: Re: [Bug #14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards Message-ID: <20091117020202.GA23066@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Tso , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , Frank Mayhar , Holger Freyther References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@mit.edu X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 32 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:37:39PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354 > Subject : Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards > Submitter : Holger Freyther > Date : 2009-10-09 15:42 (39 days old) Um, this was marked as resolved, until you reopened it and then reset the state to New. Why did you do this? It's fixed in mainline as of commit d4da6c9 when Linus reverted commit d0646f7. Users could still see it if they mount a file system with -o journal_checksum, but (a) it's no longer the default, and (b) corruption if you use the non-default journal_checksum mount option is not a regression. We have fixes to make journal_checksum safe queued for 2.6.33, but the revert fixes the regression problem. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/