Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754123AbZKQISj (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:18:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753179AbZKQISi (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:18:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54983 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751414AbZKQISh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:18:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:18:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Michel Lespinasse , Hitoshi Mitake Cc: Darren Hart , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation Message-ID: <20091117081817.GA7963@elte.hu> References: <20091117074655.GA14023@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091117074655.GA14023@google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3515 Lines: 63 * Michel Lespinasse wrote: > Sample test results, on a sun x4600 M2, using the test program > included after the diff (dumb lock/unlock stress test, comparing > FUTEX_SET_WAIT with FUTEX_WAIT): > > FUTEX_SET_WAIT test > 1 threads: 45662 Kiter/s (2.19s user 0.00s system 2.19s wall 1.00 cores) > 2 threads: 11834 Kiter/s (11.07s user 4.70s system 8.45s wall 1.87 cores) > 3 threads: 9425 Kiter/s (11.10s user 14.73s system 10.61s wall 2.43 cores) > 4 threads: 20790 Kiter/s (5.73s user 10.53s system 4.81s wall 3.38 cores) > 5 threads: 21505 Kiter/s (5.05s user 14.02s system 4.65s wall 4.10 cores) > 6 threads: 18904 Kiter/s (5.64s user 19.07s system 5.29s wall 4.67 cores) > 8 threads: 17212 Kiter/s (6.10s user 28.39s system 5.81s wall 5.94 cores) > 10 threads: 19493 Kiter/s (5.20s user 35.82s system 5.13s wall 8.00 cores) > 12 threads: 20325 Kiter/s (4.92s user 42.52s system 4.92s wall 9.64 cores) > 16 threads: 22026 Kiter/s (4.64s user 56.58s system 4.54s wall 13.48 cores) > 24 threads: 23041 Kiter/s (4.33s user 84.76s system 4.34s wall 20.53 cores) > 32 threads: 23585 Kiter/s (4.11s user 112.75s system 4.24s wall 27.56 cores) > 64 threads: 25907 Kiter/s (3.93s user 115.99s system 3.86s wall 31.07 cores) > 128 threads: 26455 Kiter/s (4.02s user 114.50s system 3.78s wall 31.35 cores) > 256 threads: 26596 Kiter/s (3.93s user 114.55s system 3.76s wall 31.51 cores) > 512 threads: 26596 Kiter/s (3.92s user 114.74s system 3.76s wall 31.56 cores) > 1024 threads: 26525 Kiter/s (3.95s user 115.96s system 3.77s wall 31.81 cores) > > FUTEX_WAIT test > 1 threads: 46083 Kiter/s (2.17s user 0.00s system 2.17s wall 1.00 cores) > 2 threads: 10811 Kiter/s (12.39s user 4.71s system 9.25s wall 1.85 cores) > 3 threads: 5353 Kiter/s (21.02s user 25.85s system 18.68s wall 2.51 cores) > 4 threads: 4277 Kiter/s (27.12s user 54.89s system 23.38s wall 3.51 cores) > 5 threads: 3861 Kiter/s (24.51s user 85.21s system 25.90s wall 4.24 cores) > 6 threads: 3540 Kiter/s (20.37s user 125.47s system 28.25s wall 5.16 cores) > 8 threads: 7257 Kiter/s (12.11s user 81.09s system 13.78s wall 6.76 cores) > 10 threads: 8271 Kiter/s (10.87s user 90.33s system 12.09s wall 8.37 cores) > 12 threads: 10965 Kiter/s (9.16s user 88.66s system 9.12s wall 10.73 cores) > 16 threads: 14472 Kiter/s (7.24s user 95.69s system 6.91s wall 14.90 cores) > 24 threads: 17331 Kiter/s (6.01s user 123.90s system 5.77s wall 22.51 cores) > 32 threads: 18939 Kiter/s (5.60s user 155.93s system 5.28s wall 30.59 cores) > 64 threads: 18727 Kiter/s (5.66s user 162.57s system 5.34s wall 31.50 cores) > 128 threads: 18349 Kiter/s (5.56s user 167.46s system 5.45s wall 31.75 cores) > 256 threads: 17271 Kiter/s (5.41s user 178.54s system 5.79s wall 31.77 cores) > 512 threads: 16207 Kiter/s (5.15s user 191.55s system 6.17s wall 31.88 cores) > 1024 threads: 14948 Kiter/s (4.72s user 208.38s system 6.69s wall 31.85 cores) This test program looks really useful. Would you be interested in adding it as a 'perf bench futex' testcase? That way kernel developers could monitor futex performance in the future as well. See 'perf bench' in the latest perf events tree: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README Do 'cd tools/perf; make -j install' to install perf. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/