Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755894AbZKQLwj (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:52:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754017AbZKQLwi (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:52:38 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:42520 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753783AbZKQLwh (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:52:37 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:52:36 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Mark Brown Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Magnus Damm , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-pm] Null suspend/resume functions Message-ID: <20091117115236.GB1376@ucw.cz> References: <20091109105858.GB1245@sirena.org.uk> <20091109133136.GC1245@sirena.org.uk> <20091116153000.GB29479@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091116153000.GB29479@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1659 Lines: 37 On Mon 2009-11-16 15:30:00, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 01:31:36PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:58:58AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:54:47AM +0900, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > Any chance someone from the PM side could comment on the issue below? > > > > > +static int fsi_runtime_nop(struct device *dev) > > > > +{ > > > > + /* Runtime PM callback shared between ->runtime_suspend() > > > > + * and ->runtime_resume(). Simply returns success. > > > > + * > > > > + * This driver re-initializes all registers after > > > > + * pm_runtime_get_sync() anyway so there is no need > > > > + * to save and restore registers here. > > > > + */ > > > > + return 0; > > > > +} > > > > > > This sets off alarm bells but it's perfectly reasonable, especially with > > > platforms able to put things into a low power state with no explicit > > > driver code now they can do power domain style things like SH. I've > > > CCed in the PM folks since this seems like a perfectly reasonable use > > > case which ought to be handled more nicely. I believe that having few nop functions around the tree should not be huge problem. If it is, you can introduce one shared top function into the core... Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/