Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752499AbZKRFQJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:16:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751122AbZKRFQJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:16:09 -0500 Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:57676 "EHLO mail-pz0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750717AbZKRFQH (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:16:07 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ZZBAwvZD4GtSwrvv1B/sGeXZmVWjNg3Ymr0wvL/EtRprgc46+Ffxxd6yK3vTcMAQ43 gXC4oTHwRx+rm0PN1Z5cdMbDrDy1lsCbXUCGSZ6iIfdy1ejmTYTmlDbHFMNLpagwCd7c p1vFfiaW1YwWmyyvo9uUPPa+V5LBkC28qGop4= Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:16:05 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Johannes Stezenbach Cc: Andrew Morton , Jiri Kosina , Linus Torvalds , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] input: atkbd - add forced release kays quirk for Samsung N130 Message-ID: <20091118051605.GA31480@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20091116171814.GA26183@sig21.net> <20091116195443.GE24026@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20091116213425.GA2128@sig21.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091116213425.GA2128@sig21.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1183 Lines: 33 On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:34:25PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > Hi Dmitry, > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:54:43AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:18:14PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > > Samsung N130 has the same function key quirks as the NC10. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach > > > --- > > > It would be nice if this could go into 2.6.32. It might also be > > > suitable for stable. > > > > 2.6.32 will allow manipulating force release quirk from userspace > > (sysfs) so I stopped accepting in-kernel quirks like this one. > > OK, makes sense. Will this be put in udev along with > the keymap setup for the function keys? I think that is the best place to put it, yes. > If yes, is > there already an example how to do it correctly so > I can submit a patch to add the N130 support there? No, but you can be the first and pave the road ;) -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/