Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757848AbZKRQq1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757780AbZKRQq0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:26 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:56797 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757752AbZKRQq0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:46:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix validate_event bug From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, Stephane Eranian In-Reply-To: <1256223091-6002-1-git-send-email-eranian@gmail.com> References: <> <1256223091-6002-1-git-send-email-eranian@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:46:25 +0100 Message-ID: <1258562785.3918.685.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1807 Lines: 54 On Thu, 2009-10-22 at 16:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > The validate_event() was failing on valid event > combinations. The function was assuming that if > x86_schedule_event() returned 0, it meant error. > But x86_schedule_event() returns the counter index > and 0 is a perfectly valid value. An error is returned > if the function returns a negative value. Good point. > Furthermore, validate_event() was also failing for > event groups because the event->pmu was not set until > after hw_perf_pmu_init(). (hw_perf_event_init, right?) Won't this give very funny results for mixed pmu groups? How about something like: if (event->pmu && event->pmu != &pmu) return 0; That should deal with new events, who do not yet have their pmu set and for those we know they're for us, but exclude events for other PMUs. > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian > -- > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > index 2e20bca..d321ff7 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > @@ -2229,10 +2229,7 @@ validate_event(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event) > { > struct hw_perf_event fake_event = event->hw; > > - if (event->pmu != &pmu) > - return 0; > - > - return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event); > + return x86_schedule_event(cpuc, &fake_event) >= 0; > } > > static int validate_group(struct perf_event *event) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/