Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932116AbZKRRSP (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:18:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932101AbZKRRSN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:18:13 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.179.29]:33153 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932070AbZKRRSL (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:18:11 -0500 Message-ID: <4B042C51.7000500@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:18:09 -0800 From: Mike Travis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Heiko Carstens , Roland Dreier , Randy Dunlap , Tejun Heo , Andi Kleen , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Yinghai Lu , "H. Peter Anvin" , David Rientjes , Steven Rostedt , Rusty Russell , Hidetoshi Seto , Jack Steiner , Frederic Weisbecker , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages References: <20091117191752.164451000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <20091117191757.651569000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com> <20091118104855.GA593@aftab> In-Reply-To: <20091118104855.GA593@aftab> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2767 Lines: 83 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 01:17:53PM -0600, Mike Travis wrote: >> When there are a large number of processors in a system, there >> is an excessive amount of messages sent to the system console. >> It's estimated that with 4096 processors in a system, and the >> console baudrate set to 56K, the startup messages will take >> about 84 minutes to clear the serial port. >> >> This set of patches limits the number of repetitious messages >> which contain no additional information. Much of this information >> is obtainable from the /proc and /sysfs. Some of the messages >> are also sent to the kernel log buffer as KERN_DEBUG messages so >> dmesg can be used to examine more closely any details specific to >> a problem. >> >> The list of message transformations.... >> >> For system_state == SYSTEM_BOOTING: >> >> Booting Node 0, Processors #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Ok. > > Aren't we missing core 0 here? Core 0 already booted as it's the Boot CPU. The info is earlier in the log. > >> Booting Node 1, Processors #8 #9 #10 #11 #12 #13 #14 #15 Ok. >> .. >> Booting Node 3, Processors #56 #57 #58 #59 #60 #61 #62 #63 Ok. >> Brought up 64 CPUs > > Also, I'm getting > > Booting Node 0, Processors #1 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) There are other patches that deal with these: http://git.kernel.org/tip/15cd8812ab2ce62a2f779e93a8398bdad752291a http://git.kernel.org/tip/b01c845f0f2e3f9e54e6a78d5d56895f5b95e818 > #2 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) > #3 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) > #4 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) > #5 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) > Ok. > Booting Node 1, Processors #6 > CPU: L1 I Cache: 64K (64 bytes/line), D cache 64K (64 bytes/line) > CPU: L2 Cache: 512K (64 bytes/line) > #7 > > ... > > and clearly CPU cache info is too verbose. We might want to > kill it since we have it replicated in /sysfs. In that case, > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:display_cacheinfo() could become obsolete > and we could remove it... Or is there some reason for dumping that > particular information during boot? > Yes, the above patches remove them entirely. Thanks, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/