Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753974AbZKRWjO (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:39:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752239AbZKRWjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:39:13 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com ([209.85.218.227]:39201 "EHLO mail-bw0-f227.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752697AbZKRWjM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:39:12 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gikDUGGu7yRRQFn0MNMNl7kgAYr52BhyJgpQjXihSLeQrJ34PcJCahASu8nwKNTtSx //RloulECrAHvTk/jYOVEZL3L6IVI1puNCNmEZTt8h8c+J8rO0zyfNnQe3e4zIgn9knD SsIRKJ74elePDUZ48GWSzaG9PvncMQmAMPu40= Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:38:51 +0100 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Caleb Cushing Cc: Frans Pop , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: large packet loss take2 2.6.31.x Message-ID: <20091118223851.GA5191@ami.dom.local> References: <81bfc67a0911111448q2e7938fcq18adf2454d6bc8f1@mail.gmail.com> <20091112113836.GA7963@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911120546g26627ac5q5860d85f446b29bb@mail.gmail.com> <4AFC5C58.9030207@gmail.com> <81bfc67a0911130825o6d9b93b2he70677157ad889f2@mail.gmail.com> <20091113211640.GA2540@ami.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911180159g45a45675k44ce3f251c6bddea@mail.gmail.com> <20091118135136.GA9224@ff.dom.local> <81bfc67a0911181021n1b969565y4a39b181360b5e92@mail.gmail.com> <20091118201034.GA3060@ami.dom.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091118201034.GA3060@ami.dom.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 16 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:10:34PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:21:19PM -0500, Caleb Cushing wrote: > > yeah testing it under my known working config first. I'll get back w/ you later. > > Btw, since dropping at hardware (NIC) level seems more likely to me, > could you send 'ethtool eth0', and 'ethtool -S eth0' after such tests > (both sides). Hmm... and 'netstat -s' before and after the test (both sides). Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/