Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757791AbZKRWpT (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:45:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756402AbZKRWpQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:45:16 -0500 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:47034 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756328AbZKRWpM (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:45:12 -0500 To: Tetsuo Handa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Removal of binary sysctl support References: <200911082215.HGJ57827.SJOVFFOHMOLFQt@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <200911090012.nA90CF2i016994@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <200911190704.CHI18293.VJOMHFtOLQSOFF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:45:13 -0800 In-Reply-To: <200911190704.CHI18293.VJOMHFtOLQSOFF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (Tetsuo Handa's message of "Thu\, 19 Nov 2009 07\:04\:19 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-XM-SPF: eid=;;;mid=;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=76.21.114.89;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 76.21.114.89 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 25 Oct 2007 00:26:12 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on in02.mta.xmission.com); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2470 Lines: 72 Tetsuo Handa writes: > Hello. > > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> Tetsuo Handa writes: >> >> > Eric W. Biederman wrote: >> >> There has been a gradual transition from the assumption that the table ends with >> >> !ctl_name to the assumption that procname == NULL. There is no sysctl entry >> >> with a valid ctl_name without a valid procname. >> > >> > I see. Then, please add below one to your patchset. >> >> I have been looking at this and in the sysctl tree I am now going through >> the vfs for all of the the operations on /proc/sys. I believe that means >> we can completely remove the sysctl special case in tomoyo. Like I have >> in the patch below. >> >> Will that work? >> >> Eric > > If you remove sysctl(2) from kernel and let userland libraries emulate > > static int name[] = { CTL_NET, NET_IPV4, NET_IPV4_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE }; > int buffer[2] = { 0, 0 }; > int size = sizeof(buffer); > sysctl(name, 3, buffer, &size, 0, 0); > > like > > FILE *fp = fopen("/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range", "r"); > int buffer[2] = { 0, 0 }; > fscanf(fp, "%u %u", &buffer[0], &buffer[1]); > fclose(fp); > > or you modify sysctl(2) to call security_dentry_open() rather than > security_sysctl(), we can completely remove the sysctl special case in tomoyo. I have done something very close, the emulation is in the kernel not user space, but the idea is the same. The relevant bits of binary_sysctl() (from my sysctl tree) are: mnt = current->nsproxy->pid_ns->proc_mnt; result = vfs_path_lookup(mnt->mnt_root, mnt, pathname, 0, &nd); if (result) goto out_putname; result = may_open(&nd.path, acc_mode, fmode); if (result) goto out_putpath; file = dentry_open(nd.path.dentry, nd.path.mnt, flags, current_cred()); result = PTR_ERR(file); if (IS_ERR(file)) goto out_putname; dentry_open calls __dentry_open which calls security_dentry_open. The twist that may get this into trouble is that I am going through the internal vfs mount of /proc instead of the normal mount of proc. So you will see paths like "/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range" instead of "/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range". I don't know how the choice of mount points affects you. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/