Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751737AbZKSGGv (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:06:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751468AbZKSGGu (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:06:50 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:51478 "EHLO mail-fx0-f221.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751359AbZKSGGt (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:06:49 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=tWjD8M/BlVvkRNihalveUwZtxUn6A/PVf0TkdJewTX2SyAQVJPDyO3+j6kmYHVkzde d97BFAh2lROCQPYtpVao9r751fsSkSiQe9AhxOVbWnLe76ubaSPievO1DjO8AA+lF9MU oluYFTdOzGj9gm2dXQSylTxctJUhJqI4VE4pc= Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:06:48 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Borislav Petkov , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the edac-amd tree with the rr tree Message-ID: <20091119060648.GA15404@liondog.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Stephen Rothwell , Borislav Petkov , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rusty Russell References: <20091119162354.8800a885.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091119162354.8800a885.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 23 Hi Stephen, On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:23:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the edac-amd tree got a conflict in > drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c because commit > 4de1ce0c99ff838090d3b57cab8bc6eeb303dda5 > ("cpumask:amd64_edac-cpumask_t-remove") from the rr tree and commit > 2fd9af91b92c10e58993f9eb70300fdff32698fb ("cpumask: use modern cpumask > style in drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c") from the edac-amd tree are the same > patch but there are further changes in the edac-amd tree. So, Rusty, I > guess you can drop that patch (unless something later in the rr tree > depends on it). yes, we agreed I should pick up this patch. Rusty? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/