Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754290AbZKSRxL (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:53:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752279AbZKSRxK (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:53:10 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f202.google.com ([209.85.211.202]:54807 "EHLO mail-yw0-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752181AbZKSRxJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:53:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LK88IFC5gu+eP0OS/vvQO1amYi7PWX98aS8dNs/sC6gaDPEqLwup2VnDHQ2c6QvYIJ /2g+USX7fvKBJ0Hjlg0zyoHuca88rZ6z7GgZhua0SAZNQlDjsYEQUv/5LfcjksLcV6PT 8XHSrhQjhBBbf4R40ceYnRx2uTdLMu5NqnH6s= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] pata: Update experimental tags Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:52:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.5-96.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik References: <20091117144450.15430.83450.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <200911191838.11791.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091119175051.6a91d160@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091119175051.6a91d160@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200911191852.23061.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 36 On Thursday 19 November 2009 18:50:51 Alan Cox wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:38:11 +0100 > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > On Thursday 19 November 2009 17:27:38 Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > > already have a buggy cable detection (since ->pre_reset ignores the mandatory > > > > > > > > > > Wrong. > > > > > > > > You cannot know it unless you know how chip operates internally. That's it. > > > > > > Read the code. How the chip operates is irrelevant. > > > > lol, there is a genuine cable detection bug in pata_hpt3x2n on closer look... > > Oh you found it now I told you which one was buggy - well done. Already > patched along with adding suspend/resume and fixing a performance funny. LOL Fixed where? I posted the patch as soon as I noticed the problem. Told me about it? Now this is extra funny since the bug been there for like three years and still would be unfixed if it wasn't for this discussion. The best part is that the bug would never have happened in the first place if you weren't artificially splitting HPT37x and HPT3xxN support cause cable detection for all those chipsets (except HPT374 fn 1) is identical!! :) -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/