Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:03:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:03:43 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:23977 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:03:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 14:03:30 -0700 Message-Id: <200203312103.g2VL3Ub17836@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: Alexander Viro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VFS locking changes in 2.5.7 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alexander Viro writes: > > On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Richard Gooch wrote: > > > Hi, Al. I've noticed that you've made changes to the locking rules > > for the VFS (for example, the inode lookup() method no longer has the > > BKL). > > > > I also note that you've thrown calls to lock_kernel() and > > unlock_kernel() into the devfs code. Did you check each place you > > added the BKL to devfs that it was needed, or was this just a blind > > global operation? At first glance, it appears that many of the places > > where the BKL was inserted are not needed. > > See Documentation/filesystems/porting Ah. Useful. > BKL had been shifted inside several methods, so that filesystem code > itself had the same locking as it used to (i.e. code that used to be > under BKL stayed under it). If your code doesn't need BKL - feel > free to shrink the area, but keep in mind that it used to be under > BKL. OK, that's what I figured. Thanks for the confirmation. > I didn't _add_ BKL - neither in devfs nor anywhere else. lock_kernel() is > the boundary of the protected area and all that had happened is that this > area had slightly shrunken, so its boundaries are inside the method instead > of being around its caller. > > Again, further shrinking is up to maintainers of the filesystems. Fair enough. I'll start looking at that. > While we are at it, the changes in question had happened quite a > couple of months ago - none of them in 2.5.7... Well, 2.5.7 is the first I've checked in a while: I've been mostly focussed on 2.4.x recently. Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/