Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753876AbZKTJP0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:15:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753384AbZKTJPZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:15:25 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f221.google.com ([209.85.220.221]:57428 "EHLO mail-fx0-f221.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753298AbZKTJPS (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:15:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=m7SoyepG0QVqT6/BMbUtrfDXYPXTm+xbgIn11OwXMhIcMmPxpk4+i6pD8sDTrKY12U KfF4Q8mb1ILI4JjtAZGdReF8WsAvjQatPCwLkeZF+gznCp9iLuP1LDekahsl2GPQDvwG 7hrcOXpGkZUCJXAMHsYB1Oq71Xz4N6P5n1KUk= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20091120090134.GD19778@elte.hu> References: <4B064AF5.9060208@cn.fujitsu.com> <20091120081440.GA19778@elte.hu> <84144f020911200019p4978c8e8tc593334d974ee5ff@mail.gmail.com> <20091120083053.GB19778@elte.hu> <4B0657A4.2040606@cs.helsinki.fi> <20091120090134.GD19778@elte.hu> Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:15:23 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 30d6af3348aa853d Message-ID: <84144f020911200115g14cfa3b5k959f8751001b8b35@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] perf: Add 'perf kmem' tool From: Pekka Enberg To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Li Zefan , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Frederic Weisbecker , Steven Rostedt , Peter Zijlstra , Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu , LKML , "linux-mm@kvack.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 872 Lines: 19 Hi Ingo, On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > But ... even without that, perf is really fast and is supposed to build > fine even in minimal (embedded) environments, so you can run it on the > embedded board too. That's useful to get live inspection features like > 'perf top', 'perf stat' and 'perf probe' anyway. Maybe I'm just too damn lazy but if I don't go through the trouble of building my kernel on the box, I sure don't want to do that for perf either. Anyway, I'm sure we can fix "perf kmem" to support what kmemtrace-user does so it's not an issue. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/