Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:17:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:17:35 -0500 Received: from [194.46.8.33] ([194.46.8.33]:36869 "EHLO angusbay.vnl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 19:17:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 01:30:15 +0100 From: Dale Amon To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Number of loopback devices Message-ID: <20020401003015.GO4583@vnl.com> Mail-Followup-To: Dale Amon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: Linux, the choice of a GNU generation Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Loopbacks are so damned useful that I'm certain I'll soon run out of them, and I doubt I'm the only person in that position, particularly with some of the improvements in the crypto patches making it possible to run an all crypto system. I note that the number is set in loop.c static int max_loop = 8; and I wonder what the safe upper limit for this is, and if there is some reason for not making it larger or perhaps making it a CONFIGurable item? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/