Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:02:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:01:52 -0500 Received: from dial-up-2.energonet.ru ([195.16.109.101]:11648 "EHLO dial-up-2.energonet.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:00:53 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 21:31:18 +0000 To: Linux Kernel Subject: Syscall by name Message-ID: <20020324213118.GA14590@bk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: =?koi8-r?B?0JzQsNC60YHQuNC8INCb0LDQv9GI0LjQvQ==?= , Linux Kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: Linux dial-up-2.energonet.ru 2.4.18 From: Max Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I saw several months ago here a message, telling about a new system call, that returnes a syscall number, by its name. So, if a module registers a new syscall dynamically, it is automatically seen by everybody. Is this idea dead? Best regards. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/