Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755307AbZKVQOY (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:14:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755274AbZKVQOX (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:14:23 -0500 Received: from netrider.rowland.org ([192.131.102.5]:37018 "HELO netrider.rowland.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755025AbZKVQOX (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:14:23 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:14:28 -0500 (EST) From: Alan Stern X-X-Sender: stern@netrider.rowland.org To: Simon Arlott cc: USB list , Kernel development list Subject: Re: cxacru usb_bulk_msg() firmware upload 36x slower with OHCI vs. UHCI In-Reply-To: <4B09196D.7040107@simon.arlott.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1803 Lines: 41 On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Simon Arlott wrote: > On 18/11/09 22:25, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Simon Arlott wrote: > >> > What happens with other sorts of devices, such as a USB flash drive? > >> > >> I can write a 10MB file to an USB flash drive over OHCI, and umount+sync > >> takes around 13 seconds. > > > > Yes, that's about right. It leads me to wonder if something funny is > > going on with the device, or least with the firmware-loading part of > > it. Odd that it works differently with UHCI and OHCI, though. There > > shouldn't be any differences visible to the device. You don't have > > anything else attached to the same bus, do you? > > Yes, but not in use and I could disconnect everything to test it. > > core/hcd.c has an interesting comment in usb_hcd_check_unlink_urb(): You mean usb_hcd_poll_rh_status(). > /* The USB 2.0 spec says 256 ms. This is close enough and won't > * exceed that limit if HZ is 100. The math is more clunky than > * maybe expected, this is to make sure that all timers for USB devices > * fire at the same time to give the CPU a break inbetween */ > > I'll try increasing the frequency of this timer too. It shouldn't make any difference; that timer is used with OHCI only in exceptional circumstances (like immediately after a device is plugged in or unplugged), not during normal operation. But maybe something strange is going on. You could add a printk in ohci_hub_status_data(), which is the routine that timer ends up calling. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/