Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:04:45 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: newidle balancing in NUMA domain?
Message-ID: <20091123170445.GA29058@elte.hu>
References: <20091123112228.GA2287@wotan.suse.de>
 <1258987059.6193.73.camel@marge.simson.net>
 <20091123151152.GA19175@wotan.suse.de>
 <1258989704.4531.574.camel@laptop>
 <20091123152931.GD19175@wotan.suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091123152931.GD19175@wotan.suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 803
Lines: 24


* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:

> > .32 is kind of closed, with us being at -rc8.
> 
> It's a bad regression though.

It's about 3 months too late for that. Ideally we want performance 
regressions to be looked for and reported when the patches go into the 
devel tree. Failing that, -rc1 would be the good time to re-test 
whatever workload you care about.

If you cannot test it in a regular fashion you can offload the testing 
to us, by adding a similar/equivalent workload to 'perf bench sched'. 
We'll make sure it stays sane.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/