Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756965AbZKWVMd (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:12:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756533AbZKWVMc (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:12:32 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:51808 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756327AbZKWVMb (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:12:31 -0500 Date: 23 Nov 2009 22:11:00 +0100 From: lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus) To: khc@pm.waw.pl Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com Cc: j@jannau.net Cc: jarod@redhat.com Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: mchehab@redhat.com Cc: superm1@ubuntu.com Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure User-Agent: OpenXP/4.10.7369 (Linux) (i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+2CGruSPmJ8Kbdv5teM38CaHVXT6GlteBhyBm eigBnJkCOuM+93RZ/ens09plWf44Y708E1hT9rHiP9xcQyooFC fklxhCxB/kwbvj2peey4dq3kB1m2p/d Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 549 Lines: 16 Czesc Krzysztof, on 23 Nov 09 at 15:14, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: [...] > I think we shouldn't at this time worry about IR transmitters. Sorry, but I have to disagree strongly. Any interface without transmitter support would be absolutely unacceptable for many LIRC users, including myself. Christoph -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/