Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933413AbZKXP04 (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933370AbZKXP0z (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44359 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933357AbZKXP0y (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:26:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:45 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: yinghai@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix gart iommu using for amd 64 bit system Message-ID: <20091124152645.GD21821@elte.hu> References: <4B0BAC06.1000905@kernel.org> <20091124193031P.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4B0BB892.9080401@kernel.org> <20091124225000H.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091124225000H.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 16 * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > don't think user will like to use SWIOTLB instead of swiotlb. > > I doubt that users care about a way to fix their problems. As far as swiotlb vs. GART goes, arguably a non-bouncing hw based solution (GART) is superior to a bouncing one (swiotlb), right? ngo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/