Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934140AbZKXVeU (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934008AbZKXVeT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:19 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:33200 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933267AbZKXVeT (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:34:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:34:22 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: Andi Kleen , Oleg Nesterov , Alexey Dobriyan , Ananth Mavinakayanahalli , Christoph Hellwig , Ingo@firstfloor.org, "Molnar References: <20091124200220.GA5828@redhat.com> <87my2bwtno.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20091124204152.GA9131@redhat.com> <20091124212619.GB29096@one.firstfloor.org> <20091124213105.GG29296@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091124213105.GG29296@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 15 > One man's obfuscation is another man's abstraction. > Would you be satisfied if "tracehook_" was renamed "utracehook_"? I would prefer if there were no thin inlines, and the functions should have a name clearly indicating for which subsystem they are for. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/