Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:39:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:38:53 -0500 Received: from customer201-108.iplannetworks.net ([200.69.201.108]:30702 "EHLO ntmba.mba") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 07:38:41 -0500 Message-ID: <3CA98CFE.8030202@laotraesquina.com.ar> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 07:50:38 -0300 From: Pablo Alcaraz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: es-ar, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 7.52 second kernel compile In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > >But it's interesting to see how on an athlon the numbers are > > 3.17: 59 > 34.94: 62 > 4.71: 85 > 54.83: 88 > >ie roughly 60% take 85-90 cycles, and 40% take ~60 cycles. I don't know >where that pattern would come from.. > In an athlon 1Ghz the numbers are: 94.49: 20 2.51: 21 I don't why the numbers are so different. Pablo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/